Supreme Court to Decide Whether Cellphone Data Falls Under Fourth Amendment

cell

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will begin hearing arguments in a case with enormous implications for Americans’ rights to privacy, freedom of speech, and freedom of association. Specifically, the court is being asked to decide whether the government may obtain information about individuals’ cellphone usage without first getting a warrant — a vital matter given the intimate details about a person’s life such data could reveal.

The case concerns Timothy Carpenter, a man convicted of acting as a getaway driver for a series of armed robberies in the Detroit, Michigan, area in 2010 and 2011. Carpenter was not among those initially arrested for the crimes, but when one of the captured robbers turned his cellphone over to the authorities, they — without first obtaining a warrant — demanded and received from various wireless carriers data related to telephone numbers found on the phone. That information — specifically, location data showing Carpenter was in the vicinity of several of the robberies — ultimately led to Carpenter’s arrest and conviction.

Carpenter appealed his conviction on the basis that his cellphone data was obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld his conviction, so Carpenter appealed to the Supreme Court.

Carpenter’s argument is straightforward: The Fourth Amendment requires the government to obtain a warrant based on probable cause before it can search a person’s private records, regardless of who is in possession of those records.

The government’s case, on the other hand, relies on the controversial “third-party doctrine,” which holds that certain information, such as bank records and telephone call logs, is exempt from the warrant requirement because the nominal owner of the information has turned it over to a third party.

According to New York magazine:

The Supreme Court has not directly applied [the third-party doctrine] in a case … since 1979. It is an open question today whether the third-party doctrine still operates. The stakes are also now much higher. The variety and amount of personal electronic data have increased exponentially over the last few decades. Almost every form of electronic information, from our emails to our Google searches to our contact lists to the websites we visit, is exposed to third parties. So if the Supreme Court affirms the third-party doctrine in the Carpenter case, all of this information may be unprotected by the Fourth Amendment. In other words, the Carpenter case is about a lot more than just cell phones. It is about whether the government can gather personal and often intimate details about any or every citizen, without any Fourth Amendment limits.

This, in turn, has First Amendment implications. Individuals could be monitored for their political activities, and their companions in these activities could be identified and monitored as well. Journalists and their sources would be prime targets for such surveillance. As the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press pointed out in its brief in support of Carpenter, cellphone location information “can reveal the stories a journalist is working on before they are published, where a journalist went to gather information for those stories, and the identity of a journalist’s sources.”

“A defeat for Carpenter would be a defeat for privacy rights, but it would also mean a dramatic curtailment of First Amendment freedoms,” Columbia University’s Jameel Jaffer and Alexander Abdo wrote in the Guardian.

No one knows how the Supreme Court will rule in the case, but recent decisions suggest that the justices are aware of the dangers of permitting unchecked government surveillance of electronic records.

In a 2011 decision against installing a GPS device on a suspect’s car without a warrant, Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued that the third-party doctrine “is ill suited to the digital age, in which people reveal a great deal of information about themselves to third parties in the course of carrying out mundane tasks.”

Two years later, in ruling that the government needed a warrant to search a suspect’s cellphone, Chief Justice John Roberts warned, “Awareness that the government may be watching chills associational and expressive freedoms.”

The court clearly should come down on Carpenter’s — and the Constitution’s — side. As Jaffer and Abdo observed, “Without strong protections for individual privacy, the freedoms of speech, association and the press will wither.”

[adrotate banner=”24″]

Great Emigration departs for Oregon

A massive wagon train, made up of 1,000 settlers and 1,000 head of cattle, sets off down the Oregon Trail from Independence, Missouri. Known as the “Great Emigration,” the expedition came two years after the first modest party of settlers ...
Read More

WALSH: The Only Thing Preventing Us From Descending Into Civil War

We’re told that “division” and “partisanship” and “bigotry” are destroying America. “Hate” is the cancer in our cultural bloodstream, they say. We must fight against hate speech and hate crimes and hate in every other form. There is so much ...
Read More

The Surprisingly Solid Mathematical Case of the Tin Foil Hat Gun Prepper Or, “Who Needs an AR-15 Anyway?”

As gun policy discussions unfold in the wake of mass shooter incidents, they routinely end in three buckets. There’s the “tyranny can never happen here” bucket, which the left has mostly abdicated in the wake of Trump winning after they ...
Read More

End of an era at the FBI

After nearly five decades as director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), J. Edgar Hoover dies, leaving the powerful government agency without the administrator who had been largely responsible for its existence and shape. Educated as a lawyer and ...
Read More

Airborne units getting new vehicle this year; legs will have to wait

The Army’s five airborne infantry brigade combat teams are slated to begin fielding 300 Ground Mobility Vehicles in use by special operations forces troops this year. The legs? They’ll get theirs next year, if the funding request is approved. Thirty ...
Read More

British Parliament adopts the Coercive Acts

Upset by the Boston Tea Party and other blatant acts of destruction of British property by American colonists, the British Parliament enacts the Coercive Acts, to the outrage of American Patriots, on this day in 1774.The Coercive Acts were a ...
Read More

Jefferson elected to the Continental Congress

Future President Thomas Jefferson is elected to the second Continental Congress on this day in 1775. Jefferson, a Virginia delegate, quickly established himself in the Continental Congress with the publication of his paper entitled A Summary View of the Rights ...
Read More

7 EMP Proof Items for Your Bugout Bag

This post was gladly contributed by Ben Ayad from Outdorrs Time. There was a time when the world thought the nuclear bomb was as bad as it could get in war. Times have changed, and we know that the one ...
Read More

Parliament passes the Boston Port Act

On this day in 1774, British Parliament passes the Boston Port Act, closing the port of Boston and demanding that the city’s residents pay for the nearly $1 million worth (in today’s money) of tea dumped into Boston Harbor during ...
Read More

[adrotate group="4"]

 

[adrotate banner="24"]

Most Read Stories

Project Thor
Defense

Did the U.S. Just launch “Project Thor” as the secret ZUMA Payload that SpaceX just put into Orbit?

The 107-country Outer Space Treaty signed in 1967 prohibits nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons from being placed or used from Earth’s orbit. What they didn’t count on was the U.S. Air Force’s most simple weapon […]

Police State
Defense

With a Stroke of a Pen, PA Governor Wolf Limits Firearm Rights by Proclaiming State of Emergency

Today, Pennsylvania Governor Wolf issued a proclamation declaring Pennsylvania’s heroin and opioid epidemic a statewide disaster emergency, seemingly triggering the firearm prohibitions found in 18 Pa.C.S. § 6107 during declared emergencies. Specifically, Section 6107 provides: (a) General […]

Goodbye Brass
Defense

Goodbye, Brass?

by Art Merrill – Monday, February 13, 2017 Let’s skip the appetizer and get right to the meat and potatoes of a manufacturer’s claims for a new cartridge case technology to replace the 150-year reign of […]